Finished Match Overview CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs Zero Tenacity in CS 2

CS2CS2

NODWIN Clutch Series #11

CYBERSHOKE Prospects

CYBERSHOKE Prospects

2:108/24
Zero Tenacity

Zero Tenacity

3Cache13
13Anubis4
13Dust210

Winio Prediction

Before draft

20%

Prediction: Zero Tenacity

80%

Additional predictions

Total maps

66.6%

Prediction: 2 maps

33.4%
2 maps3 maps

Pistol rounds

Round 1 (1st half)

43.9%

Prediction: Zero Tenacity

56.1%
CYBERSHOKE ProspectsZero Tenacity

Round 13 (2nd half)

45.1%

Prediction: Zero Tenacity

54.9%
CYBERSHOKE ProspectsZero Tenacity

Player statistics

Map 1: Cache

PlayerKDAADRKAST%HSFKFK±
ex-Zero Tenacity
1511693.268.8%7--
149590.887.5%8--
147476.181.2%8--
1210687.487.5%8--
119477.775%6--
CYBERSHOKE Prospects (W)
1213181.950%6--
1013470.762.5%3--
913165.750%4--
814156.468.8%4--
513250.881.2%3--

Map 2: Anubis

PlayerKDAADRKAST%HSFKFK±
ex-Zero Tenacity
1313689.364.7%8--
1215266.858.8%7--
712463.670.6%5--
714561.064.7%3--
615037.929.4%0--
CYBERSHOKE Prospects (W)
2366134.7100%4--
1410688.582.4%9--
1412690.494.1%10--
1110264.970.6%5--
77244.276.5%6--

Map 3: Dust2

PlayerKDAADRKAST%HSFKFK±
ex-Zero Tenacity
2014372.778.3%10--
1712781.287%6--
1318879.578.3%6--
1015339.160.9%5--
919565.369.6%4--
CYBERSHOKE Prospects (W)
2211796.078.3%11--
1715379.278.3%10--
1614790.482.6%13--
1215669.069.6%8--
714234.365.2%2--

Map draft

Picks

No data

Bans

No data

CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs Zero Tenacity — CS2 Match Analysis, August 24 2026

Explore a detailed breakdown of the CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs Zero Tenacity match at NODWIN Clutch Series #11. Winio's analytical model processed every phase of the game, identified the decisive factors, and measured how closely the pre-match prediction matched the actual result.

CS2 Post-match Analysis: What's Inside

  • Final result and prediction accuracy. Compare the pre-match win probability with the actual outcome and see which factors proved decisive.
  • Key moments that changed the game. A breakdown of the critical events that shaped the result: turning points, map control shifts, and individual performances.
  • Full match statistics. Detailed metrics for both teams and every player: rating, ADR, KAST, map efficiency, and other indicators that explain the final score.
  • Comparison with previous meetings. See how this match fits into the teams' head-to-head history and which patterns repeated.

Use finished match data to understand how Winio's model performs over time. Each completed match adds to the prediction history available at the Ended Matches section.

Current CS2 matches

Loading events...

CS2 Esports Articles